Last week, the U.S. government arrested a man accused of one the worst leaks of national security material in years.
Spiders Catapult From Sex
Who is the culprit?
Heâs not exactly Edward Snowden.
According to federal prosecutors, the person responsible for leaking sensitive Pentagon material was none other than Jack Teixeira, a fresh-faced 21-year-old member of the Massachusetts Air National Guard. Despite his youth, Teixiera was given a clearance to handle âTop Secretâ compartmented information, a responsibility federal officials say he abused to illegitimately access and share classified documents with friends on Discord.
From a certain angle, the Teixeira case is only the latest iteration of a longstanding problem that the federal government has never quite figured out how to solve. Indeed, ever since Daniel Ellsberg leaked the Pentagon Papers to the New York Times in 1971, whistleblowers and leakers have been a major national security concern. Itâs arguable that there hasnât been an incident of this sort for awhileânot since the early Trump years, when Wikileaks was still disclosing reams of classified documents from agencies like the CIA and NSA.
But there are pretty obvious differences between the Wikileaks situation and this one. For one thing, the material in that case was distributed by a highly organized hacktivist group that was operating in close coordination with government insiders, namely Chelsea Manning. It was also an ideologically-driven project. Julian Assange, the groupâs head honcho, was stalwart in what he saw as a mission to expose the U.S. governmentâs secretsâand its crimes.
Thatâs a far cry from this caseâin which a 21-year-old kid appears to have been messing around online and leaked information that could inadvertently sway a war in Europe. Teixeira doesnât seem to have had an ideological reason for sharing this materialâhe wasnât trying to warn the public about a nefarious surveillance program, nor was he divulging previously unknown government corruption. Instead, according to officials, the young airman was simply trying to impress a bunch of fellow Discord users with his government bona fides.
Who is Jack Teixeira, and what did he allegedly do?
At the time of the leaks, Teixeira was stationed at Otis Air National Guard Base on Cape Cod, where he served as a âcyber transport systems journeyman.â At the same time that he worked as an IT operator, however, the 21-year-old also secretly ran an online Discord community, comically known as âThug Shaker Central.â The group was reportedly a cess pool for juvenile and offensive rhetoric, as well as a forum for talking about guns. It is in this closed online chat group where Teixeira is said to have shared troves of classified documents with other members of the groupâmany of whom were teenagers.
What was in those documents? You should recall that the leaks revealed a broad array of sensitive government secrets. Some of the documents are purported to have involved U.S. and NATO âwar plansâ related to the Russo-Ukrainian war. Others appear to have revealed sensitive information about U.S. spying activities aimed at both friendly and adversarial nations alike.
The motive for Teixeira to leak the docs has been chalked up to a juvenile desire to impress the other members of the group.
How Teixeira became a suspect in the Pentagonâs leaks
Even the way in which Teixeira was initially identified as a suspect is highly unusual. The FBI doesnât appear to have been the first organization to track down Teixeiraâat least not publicly.
Instead, The New York Times teamed up with Bellingcat, the open source intelligence (OSINT) research organization, to decipher who might be responsible for the leaks. In an investigation published on April 9th, Bellingcat revealed that a trail of digital clues had led them to identify a slew of Discord communities where the classified material was originally shared. Bellingcatâs investigation showed that the material had trickled into those communities via a since deleted Discord group, âThug Shaker Centralââthe admin of which, we now know, was Teixeira. From there, the documents were spread to other websites, including 4chan, Telegram, and Twitter, before ultimately grabbing the attention of the government and the press.
The Times, meanwhile, claims that its digital investigators were able to use open source investigation techniques to identify a match between the granite countertop in the background of some of the leak images and the countertop in an online picture of Teixeira standing in his parentsâ kitchen. (????) If true, thatâs some serious Sherlock Holmes-level shit.
Meanwhile, the FBIâs criminal affidavit against Teixeiraâwhich was unsealed on Fridayâprovides additional details about how investigators uncovered his identity. Interestingly, it shows that major developments in the governmentâs case didnât occur until after the press investigations were published.
On April 10th, a day after the Bellingcat and the Times went to press with their reports, the FBI interviewed a member of the relevant Discord group, the recently unsealed affidavit states. Through that interview, agents discovered that Teixeira had been posting material on the platform since as early as December of 2022. He initially posted the information as âparagraphs of textââmeaning he was copying it from the original documents. However, in January, he began posting pictures of the documents. The affidavit notes that the unauthorized disclosure of this information could reasonably âbe expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national securityâ of the country.
That potential âdamageâ is why Teixeira was arrested last week and why he could spend up to 15 years in prison.
Key question: How the heck did this happen?Â
This story inspires a lot of questions, but one of the most pressing is whether the Defense Department is run by a bunch of bozos who donât mind sharing highly sensitive data with someone obviously too young to handle it.
Seriously, how exactly does something like this happen?
Nicholas Grossman, a professor of International Relations at the University of Illinois, told Gizmodo that while the idea that Teixeira had access to this information may seem bizarre, itâs not out of the question. In a direct message, Grossman noted that âwhile the whole thing sounds stupidâ it was also, unfortunately, âplausible.â
âAssuming itâs true, I donât know why he had access to this info, or whether he was supposed to,â he added. âBut he probably shouldnât have.â
Grossman characterized the episode as a âserious intelligence failure,â noting that there are still things we donât know about the situation. âThis guy was taking classified material and sharing it onlineâwith people who didnât have security clearance, couldâve been hiding their identity, and possibly werenât Americanâfor months without the US catching it until some of his internet friends put the stuff on Discord.â In short: the whole situation is a giant mess.
How much access did Teixeira have to sensitive documents?
News of Teixeiraâs alleged role in the leaks has spurred a broader conversation about weaknesses in government secrecy. Indeed, some 1.2 million Americans are said to hold âTop Secretâ security clearances, just like Teixeira did. Doesnât that really seem like way too many people?
Jeffrey Fields, an Associate Professor of International Relations at the University of Southern California, said that some of the information that Teixeira is accused of leakingâthe information labeled âSecretââwould have been easy to access even if he had a low-level security clearance. âItâs not surprising,â said Fields, though he admitted it was surprising what Teixeira had done with the material. Fields is in a position to know about this because, prior to his academic career, he worked in both the Pentagon and the State Department as a defense analyst. A lot of classified material can be found in government databases that are freely available to low level staff, he said.
Fields recalls having personally used SIPRnet (short for Secure Internet Router Protocol Network), a system of servers run by the Pentagon and the State Department that can be used to search for and read about classified material up to the level of âSecretâ information. âSay you wanted to know something about the political situation in Angola,â said Fields. âYou can just open up a browser window [in SIPRnet] as you would if you were searching the open source internetâ and run a search that will tell you about whatâs happening in that country, he said. âThereâs also sorts of Wikipedia-like things that will help you with stuff like that.â
Some of the documents that Teixeira leaked were at the level of âSecret,â although others were decidedly more importantâincluding a number that labeled âTop Secret.â That makes the situation a little more complicated. Fields said itâs somewhat unclear why Teixeirâeven if he had a clearance to view certain documentsâwould have had access to them. âJust because he had the clearance doesnât mean he had a need-to-know, doesnât mean he had access to do that,â Fields said, which makes it something of an open question as to how and why he would have gotten ahold of certain material.
Itâs been reported that it was Teixeiraâs role as an IT technician that allowed him access to sensitive classified information, although the details as to how that would have technically worked have not been spelled out at this time.