Google pays Apple 36% of its search advertising revenue from Safari, according to new details brought to light in Googleā€™s search antitrust trial on Monday as reported by Bloomberg. The mere utterance of the number, which Google and Apple have tried to keep sealed, caused Googleā€™s main litigator John Schmidtlein to visibly cringe.

Googleā€™s Antitrust Case Is the Best Thing That Ever Happened to AI

ā€œLike the revenue share percentage itself, they are a commercially sensitive part of the financial terms of an agreement currently in effect,ā€ said Google in a filing last week, hoping to keep the true number sealed from the publicā€™s eye.

CEO Sundar Pichai testified in October that Google is not a monopoly in search, but is simply better than competitors. In contrast, Kevin Murphy, an economics professor at the University of Chicago, revealed Google coughs up more than a third of its advertising revenue on Safari as part of a deal to be Appleā€™s default search engine. The court learned in October that Google paid $26 billion to be the default search engine of multiple phones and browsers in 2021, and $18 billion of that reportedly goes to Apple.

Last weekā€™s court filing from Google says the Department of Justice did not even wish to unseal this number. It seems Murphy, who was called by Google to defend the billion-dollar search agreements, may have just let this one slip. Murphy claimed these agreements were normal, competitive behavior in the search industry.

ā€œThe payments that Google makes reflect that competition,ā€ said Murphy, according to Reuters.

Itā€™s well known that Google and Apple share revenue, but not in this much detail. In Pichaiā€™s testimony, he said the search engine has tried to give users a ā€œseamless and easyā€ experience, even if that meant paying exorbitant fees to do so. Court documents revealed this month show the 20 queries Google makes the most revenue on, including ā€œiPhone,ā€ ā€œAuto insurance,ā€ ā€œHulu,ā€ and ā€œAARP.ā€

Google is giving up a lot more sensitive information than it would have liked to in this trial. In a Monday filing, Google requested that the transcripts of two Google executivesā€™ testimonies be partially redacted, citing ā€œan inadvertent slip of the tongueā€ pertaining to commercially sensitive information. The testimonies Google wants partially redacted appear to be from Nov. 7, the day Googleā€™s VP of Travel Products Richard Holden and Googleā€™s VP of Global Partnerships Adrienne McCallister testified.

Read More

The General

View all posts